Alcohols and the Anesthetic, Halothane, Enhance Glycine Receptor Function
Tina K. Machu, Dept. of Pharmacology Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Send correspondence to:
Tina K. Machu, Ph.D.
Dept. of Pharmacology
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
3601 Fourth Street
Lubbock, TX 79430
806-743-2425
FAX 806-743-2744
E-mail: phrtkm@ttuhsc.edu
KEY WORDS: receptor, ethanol, alcohol, anesthetic, halothane, oocyte,
Glycine receptors are the predominant inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in brain stem and spinal cord (reviewed in Betz, 1991). Purified glycine receptors contain two homologous polypeptides, alpha and beta. To date, four alpha and one beta subunits have been identified through molecular cloning techniques. The ligand-binding site of the glycine receptor has been localized to the alpha subunits, which form homo-oligomeric receptors in heterologous expression systems, such as the Xenopus laevis oocyte (Grenningloh et al., 1990a). In addition to being an integral subunit of the native glycine receptor, the beta subunit appears to be the site through which gephyrin, a putative cytoskeletal docking protein, binds to localize the receptor in postsynaptic membranes of neurons (Kirsch and Betz, 1995).
Glycine receptors in adult brain and spinal cord are accepted as being composed of alpha and beta subunits, given their insensitivity to picrotoxin, which the beta subunit confers (Pribilla et al., 1992). In contrast, glycine receptors in developing rat brain are presumed to be homomeric alpha2 subunit receptors due to their sensitivity to picrotoxin (Akaike and Kaneda, 1989; Mori-Okamoto and Tatsuno, 1985) and the predominance of the alpha2 subunit in the early stages of development (Betz, 1991). Glycine receptors are members of the superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels, of which the nicotinic receptor is the prototype. Many of these receptors are targets for alcohol and anesthetic modulation (Harris et al., 1995; Franks and Lieb, 1994; Sanna and Harris, 1993) and because of their roles in regulating synaptic transmission, ligand-gated ion channels are prime candidates for producing the mechanism of action for both classes of drugs. Very little work has been done to characterize the sensitivity of glycine receptors to alcohols or anesthetics. In general, ethanol has been reported to enhance glycine-induced Cl- currents in chick spinal cord neurons (Celentano et al., 1988), rat brain synaptoneurosomes (Engblom and Akerman, 1991), and cultured mouse neurons (Aguayo and Pancetti, 1994). The volatile anesthetics, halothane and enflurane, stimulate glycine-induced currents in dissociated neurons (Wakamori et al., 1991), while isoflurane enhances alpha2 glycine receptors expressed in HEK293 cells (Harrison et al., 1993).
While alcohols and anesthetics share many neurochemical features, recent work has indicated that protein domains may confer sensitivity to these drugs, and furthermore, that these sites in ligand-gated ion channels may, in fact, be distinct. For instance, ethanol and halothane both enhance 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor function, but halothane potentiates receptor function in the presence of saturating concentrations of ethanol (Machu and Harris, 1994). Subunit requirements observed for stimulation of GABAa receptor function by subanesthetic concentrations of ethanol (Wafford et al., 1991) are not shared by enflurane (Mihic et al., 1994), isoflurane (Harrison et al., 1993) or the intravenous anesthetic, propofol (Jones et al., 1995). Furthermore, members of the kainate/AMPA (GluR 1-3) and kainate (GluR6) family of receptors are all inhibited by ethanol (Dildy-Mayfield and Harris, 1995), while GluR1-3 are inhibited and GluR6 is stimulated by volatile anesthetics (Harris et al., 1995), respectively.
The sensitivities of cloned glycine receptors to alcohols and anesthetics have not been studied. As a first step, I have examined the actions of ethanol, butanol, and halothane on glycine mediated Cl- currents in oocytes expressing alpha1 or alpha2 glycine receptors. The characterization of these compounds on defined channels will provide the framework for further study of primary and secondary structural requirements for drug action.
Xenopus laevis female frogs were obtained from Xenopus I (Ann Arbor, MI). Glycine was purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) and strychnine was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Halothane was purchased from Ayerst (New York, NY). The bath concentration of halothane, 25% of its original bottle concentration, was determined by gas chromatography as previously described by Lin et al. (1992). The alpha1 and alpha2 glycine receptor cDNAs were provided by Dr. Heinrich Betz.
Isolation of Xenopus oocytes. X. laevis frogs were kept in tanks in dechlorinated tap water at 19o C on a 12-hour light/dark cycle and were fed a diet of mealworms and beef heart 3 times per week. Frogs were anesthetized by immersion in ice water for 45 min and were kept on ice during surgery. After surgical removal, ovarian lobes were placed in modified Barth's solution (MBS) containing (in mM) NaCl 88, KCl 1, NaHCO3 2.4, HEPES 10, MgSO4 0.82, Ca(NO3)2 0.33, CaCl2 0.91, (pH 7.5).
Before dissection, ovarian lobes were placed in hypertonic isolation media containing (in mM) NaCl 108, KCl 2, EDTA 1, and HEPES 10 (pH 7.5). Stage V and VI oocytes were dissected with fine surgical forceps as previously described (Dildy-Mayfield and Harris, 1992) and placed in MBS. Oocytes were treated with collagenase Type 1A (0.5 mg/ml) in (mM) NaCl 83, KCl 2, MgCl2 1 and HEPES 10 (pH 7.5) to remove the follicular cell layer, and rinsed in MBS.
Microinjection of oocytes with Glycine Receptor cDNA. Glycine receptor cDNAs were subcloned in the pCis vector which expresses well when injected into the oocyte nucleus. The "blind" method for nuclear injection described by Colman (1984) was used to inject 50 pg - 5 ng of glycine receptor cDNA dissolved in 30 nl of diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water per oocyte. Oocytes were maintained at 18oC in sterile filtered incubation media (MBS containing 10 mg/l streptomycin, 50 mg/l gentamicin, 10,000 U penicillin/l, 0.5 mM theophylline, and 2 mM sodium pyruvate). Incubation media was changed daily. Oocytes were recorded from day 1 through 7 following injection.
Electrophysiological Recording of Glycine Receptor Responses. Oocytes were perfused (2 ml/min) in a 100 u1 volume recording chamber with MBS via a roller pump (Cole Parmer Instrument, Co., Chicago, IL). Oocytes were impaled with 2 glass electrodes (1.2 mm outside diameter and 1 - 10 megohm resistance) filled with 3 M KCl. Oocytes were voltage clamped to -70 mV using a Warner Instruments Model OC-725A (Hamden, CT) oocyte clamp. Clamping currents were plotted on a strip chart recorder (Cole Parmer Instrument Co., Chicago, IL).
Glycine was dissolved in MBS and applied for 30 sec. Alcohols and anesthetics were coapplied with glycine. Alcohols were preapplied for 1 min prior to glycine plus alcohol application.
Data Analysis Prism Software (San Diego, CA) was used to determine EC50s and Hill coefficients. Prism or Instat (San Diego, CA) Software was used to perform one- or two- way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-tests. One-way ANOVA was used, in some cases, to evaluate the effects of drug concentration on a construct. Two-way ANOVA was used to simultaneously examine the effects of drug concentration and receptor construct. The unpaired Student's t-test was used to examine any differences in the effects of a single concentration of drug on the two receptor constructs.
Calculation of MAC values. Concentrations of anesthetics in the oocyte perfusion chamber were converted to concentrations at 37o C with the equation reported by Franks and Lieb (1993):
(Concentration at 22o C)/(Concentration at 37o C) = exp [(-4.08(37-22))/(273.15+22)]
Concentrations at 37o C were converted to MAC by the equation:
Molar concentration at 37o C = MAC x (saline/gas partition coefficient) x ((273/310)/22.4)
Currents produced by glycine in oocytes expressing alpha1 or alpha2 (Fig.1) receptors were almost completely blocked by strychnine (500 nM). Recovery was essentially complete after several min of washout. Glycine concentration-response curves were generated for the alpha1 and alpha2 (Fig.2) receptor constructs. An EC50 of 85 uM and a Hill coefficient of 2.5 were calculated for oocytes expressing the alpha1 receptor. Glycine was less potent in oocytes expressing the alpha2 receptor, with an EC50 of 142 uM and a Hill coefficient of 2.29. Hill coefficients and EC50s fall within the range of that previously reported for recombinant glycine receptors (Taleb and Betz, 1994; Bormann et al., 1993; Cascio et al., 1993; Langosch et al., 1990).
Ethanol stimulated glycine receptor function in alpha1 and alpha2 receptor containing oocytes (Fig. 3). Ethanol stimulation was concentration dependent, but did not plateau over the range of concentrations tested (Fig.4). In either alpha1 or alpha2 receptor containing oocytes, ethanol concentrations less than 50 mM produced potentiation of receptor function in approximately half the oocytes tested, but the enhancement was small (<15%, data not shown). Concentrations of ethanol higher than 200 mM tend to produce oscillations in the baseline, which may be due to release of intracellular Ca2+ stores (Wafford et al., 1989). Therefore, higher ethanol concentrations were not tested. There were no significant differences between the two constructs in their sensitivity to ethanol (p=0.9474), but there was a significant effect of ethanol concentration (p<0.0001). Approximately 15% of oocytes expressing either receptor subtype were insensitive to ethanol (50-200 mM); these data were not included in Fig.4. This lack of sensitivity was not oocyte batch dependent, nor was it a function of the level of expression of the receptor in a given oocyte. When tested, these ethanol "insensitive" oocytes were modulated by higher chain alcohols and halothane. Finally, the ability of ethanol (100 mM) to enhance glycine mediated currents in either receptor construct was attenuated by increasing glycine concentrations (>EC20, data not shown).
Figure 5 contains representative tracings of butanol stimulation of glycine receptor responses. Butanol also enhanced glycine receptor function in a concentration dependent manner (Fig.6), but to a greater degree than ethanol. In addition, the difference in potency between ethanol and butanol is consistent with the Meyer-Overton hypothesis (Meyer,1901; Overton, 1896), which predicts that lipophilicity is correlated with anesthetic potency. The enhancement of glycine mediated currents did not reach a maximum within the range of butanol concentrations tested, and there were no significant differences between the two constructs in their sensitivity to butanol (p=0.8886). There was a significant effect of butanol concentration (p<0.0001). The ability of butanol (10 mM) to enhance glycine receptor responses was tested as a function of increasing concentrations of glycine (Fig.7). In either alpha1 or alpha2 receptor expressing oocytes, butanol stimulation of function was reduced with increasing concentrations of glycine (p<0.0001, alpha1 and alpha2). At maximal glycine concentrations, no enhancement of function was seen, suggesting that butanol enhances the potency of glycine, but not its efficacy, in both receptor constructs.
Inward currents produced by glycine in the absence and presence of halothane in oocytes expressing alpha1 and alpha2 receptors are depicted in Fig 8. Halothane enhanced glycine mediated currents in a concentration dependent manner (Fig.9). Potentiation was seen with the lower concentrations (0.16 and 0.32 mM) tested, which correspond to that used clinically. Like ethanol and butanol, potentiation of receptor function did not reach a maximum over the range of concentrations tested. Concentrations in excess of 2.5 mM (10 MAC) were not tested because they are not pharmacologically relevant. While potentiation varied with increasing halothane concentration (p< 0.0001), there was no significant difference between the two constructs in their sensitivity to halothane (p=0.0533). However, there was a definite tendency for the oocytes expressing the alpha2 subunit to be more sensitive to halothane, which most likely may be explained by the fact that 50 uM glycine was used to test both constructs. This concentration of glycine represents an EC62 for the alpha1 receptor and an EC4 for the alpha2 receptor, respectively. Figure 10 shows that there is a distinct glycine concentration dependency for halothane potentiation. When equieffective concentrations of glycine at the two constructs ( alpha1: 15 uM and alpha2: 50 uM) are compared with respect to potentiation by 0.25 mM halothane, there is no significant difference (Student's unpaired, two tailed t-test, p=0.1). The finding that halothane's ability to enhance glycine responses declines markedly with increasing concentrations of glycine (p<0.0001, alpha1 and alpha2) suggests that this anesthetic enhances glycine potency, but not efficacy, at alpha1 and alpha2 receptors.
In recent years, the hypothesis that alcohols and anesthetics produce central nervous system depression through the disordering of membrane lipids has fallen into disfavor. While lipophilicity, in general, is a good indicator of alcohol/anesthetic potency (Meyer, 1901; Overton, 1896), it is clear that membrane disordering can be produced by compounds that do not produce intoxication or anesthesia (Buck et al., 1989). Furthermore, Franks and Lieb (1984) showed that anesthetics have potent actions on purified proteins in the absence of any lipids. Their groundbreaking work with firefly luciferase gave rise to the hypothesis that alcohols and anesthetics may act through partitioning into hydrophobic domains of proteins. Because of their roles in mediating synaptic transmission, ligand-gated ion channels are prime protein candidates for mediating the behavioral sequelae associated with intoxicant-anesthetic drugs.
Numerous studies have been conducted on most of the members of the superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels, as well as the glutamate family of receptors, with respect to their modulation by alcohols (reviewed in Sanna and Harris, 1993) and anesthetics (reviewed by Harris et al., 1995). However, scant attention has been given to the strychnine sensitive glycine receptor, which is important in regulating motor and sensory functions (reviewed by Betz, 1991). While sparsely present in higher brain structures, the glycine receptor is plentiful in brainstem and spinal cord, two areas of the central nervous system which have been largely overlooked in recent years with regard to the pharmacology of alcohols and anesthetics. Two lines of evidence indicate that anesthesia may be produced by subcortical structures. In goats, the MAC for halothane is ~ 2.5 fold greater when midbrain and forebrain structures alone are administered drug than when the entire body is perfused (Antognini and Schwartz, 1993). MAC is unaltered in rats by decerebration (Rampil et al., 1993). While many of the behaviors associated with ethanol intoxication may likely be due to impairment of higher brain structures, motor incoordination could be, in part, attributable to ethanol actions at brain stem and spinal cord. Recent findings have shown that glycine administered intracerebroventricularly enhances the depressant properties of a hypnotic dose of ethanol as measured by loss of righting reflex (Williams et al., 1995). This enhanced depressant effect was antagonized by low doses of strychnine, suggesting that it occurred through the inhibitory glycine receptor and not through the glycine sensitive site of the NMDA receptor.
The stimulation of alpha1 and alpha2 glycine receptors by ethanol and butanol that I report here represents the first demonstration that the cloned glycine receptor is modulated by alcohols. Previous work by other investigators in spinal cord neurons (Celanto et al., 1988), rat brain synaptoneurosomes (Engleblom and Akerman, 1991), and cultured mouse neurons (Aguayo and Pancetti, 1994) has shown that native glycine receptors are stimulated by ethanol. Aguayo and Pancetti (1994) found that ethanol enhancement of glycine receptors in spinal neurons was not saturable, even at high ethanol concentrations (400 mM), which is similar to my finding of a lack of saturation with 200 mM ethanol. Similarly, I did not see saturation with butanol over the range of concentrations tested. To be consistent with a "hydrophobic pocket" hypothesis in which there are a finite number of sensitive site(s) in the receptor, there theoretically must be a concentration high enough to saturate the sites. However, in many cases, this concentration may not be water soluble, as we have observed with long chain alcohols (Mascia et al., submitted). The observation that butanol is more potent than ethanol is consistent with the hydrophobic pocket hypothesis, given that butanol, a more lipophilic alcohol than ethanol, would be predicted to partition into alcohol sensitive sites with higher affinity. In agreement with the other investigators cited above, I observed that ethanol had actions on glycine receptors in the intoxicating range (25-50 mM), as well as the anesthetic range (>150 mM), suggesting that glycine receptors could participate in the mechanism of action of both ethanol induced intoxication and anesthesia.
My finding that the function of alpha1 and alpha2 subunits of the glycine receptor is enhanced by the volatile anesthetic, halothane, is consistent with the hypothesis that general anesthesia may be entirely, or in part, mediated by an increase in inhibitory neurotransmission, as has been reported for the GABAa receptor (reviewed by Harris et al., 1995). Only one other group has investigated glycine receptor subunit subtypes' sensitivities to anesthetics. Harrison and coworkers (1993) reported that alpha2 glycine receptors expressed in HEK293 cells were stimulated by 0.82 mM isoflurane. Most evidence that glycine receptors are targets of anesthetics has been obtained in nervous tissue preparations. Wakamori and coworkers (1991) examined the actions of halothane and enflurane on glycine induced currents in neurons dissociated from ratnucleus tractus solitarius. Their studies showed that both volatile anesthetics enhanced glycine receptor function in a concentration dependent manner. Furthermore, they reported that enflurane and halothane decreased the Kd for glycine, without having any effect on the maximum glycine response. These results are mirrored by mine, since I observed an increase in glycine potency, but not efficacy with both alpha1 and alpha2 glycine receptors. I also observed that halothane increased glycine receptor responses in a concentration dependent manner. My results, as well as that of Harrison et al. (1993) and Wakamori et al. (1991), suggest that these volatile anesthetics act at glycine receptors in a pharmacologically relevant range. Wakamori et al. (1991) reported an increase in glycine mediated currents with halothane concentrations as low as ~ 0.5 MAC and plateauing at ~ 4 MAC. I observed potentiation of both alpha1 and alpha2 receptors with halothane concentrations as low as 0.25 MAC, but I did not observe saturation at the highest concentration (10 MAC) tested. These results all suggest that glycine receptors are potentiated by concentrations of halothane within the range of that used clinically (0.75-1.25 MAC), thus underscoring the possibility that the glycine receptor plays a role in the mechanism of action of these anesthetics.
A large number of classes of compounds produce anesthesia, some of which are fairly selective to one type of ligand-gated ion channel . For instance, the steroid alphaxalone primarily modulates GABAa receptors (Hill-Venning et al., 1993), and the barbiturates are much more potent at GABAa receptors than at other receptors. In the glutamate family of receptors, NMDA receptors are selectively inhibited by the dissociative anesthetic, ketamine (Macdonald et al., 1989; Macdonald et al., 1987). These observations suggest that, in some cases, specific drugs may act at one receptor type to produce anesthesia. However, other classes of anesthetics, such as the volatile anesthetics, are less discriminating and may produce anesthesia by interacting at multiple ligand-gated ion channels. These observations are consistent with the idea that anesthesia may be the sum total of stimulation of inhibitory neurotransmission and/or depression of excitatory neurotransmission that is specific to the respective class of anesthetic in question. Thus, the fact that glycine receptors are not responsive to barbiturates (Hales and Lambert, 1991) or alphaxalone (Hill-Vening et al., 1993), for instance, does not preclude their participation in mediating anesthesia produced by other classes of compounds such as the volatile anesthetics.
Stimulation by alcohols and anesthetics of homomeric alpha1 and alpha2 subunits of the glycine receptor expressed in oocytes reveals that a minimal requirement for such action in a glycine receptor is an alpha subunit. Glycine receptors present in adult brain or spinal cord are generally accepted to be composed of alpha and beta subunits. The premise for this notion is that native glycine receptors are insensitive to picrotoxin, whereas alpha subunit homomers are picrotoxin sensitive; the beta subunit confers picrotoxin insensitivity (Pribilla et al., 1992). However, in developing rat brain, alpha2 subunits predominate (Betz, 1991), and these are presumed to be homomeric receptors, given the picrotoxin sensitivity of glycine receptors in developing rat brain (Akaike and Kaneda, 1989; Mori-Okamoto and Tatsuno, 1985). The results of the present study, taken together with previous work in nervous tissue preparations (Aguayo and Pancetti, 1994; Engleblom and Akerman, 1991; Wakamori et al., 1991; Celento et al., 1988), suggest that the presence of the beta subunit does not alter the sensitivity of glycine receptors to alcohols or anesthetics. Beta subunits are not very efficiently assembled with alpha subunits in expression systems, such as the Xenopus oocyte (Grenningloh et al., 1990b), and therefore were not tested. Thus the contribution, if any, of beta subunits to alcohol or anesthetic action glycine receptors is unknown. Beta subunits are more widely distributed in the CNS and in greater numbers than are alpha subunits (Betz, 1991), Beta subunit homomers in expression systems are weakly responsive to glycine in comparison with alpha subunits or native alpha plus beta subunits (Grenningloh et al., 1990b); therefore a direct contribution of beta subunit homomeric receptors, if they do occur in vivo, to glycine mediated neuronal inhibition via an increase in Cl- influx is doubtful. However, beta subunits appear to perform an important function in binding the glycine receptor to gephyrin, a cytoskeletal anchoring protein (Kirsch and Betz, 1995).
The nature of the site or sites in which alcohols and anesthetics act in glycine receptors, as well as other ligand-gated ion channels, remains unknown. Subunit specific requirements in recombinant GABAa (Wafford et al., 1991) and kainate receptors (Harris et al., 1995) for alcohol/anesthetic modulation suggest a protein site of action. However, these sites may not be the same, given the lack of subunit specificity in the GABAa receptor for potentiation by anesthetics (Jones et al., 1995; Mihic et al., 1994) versus the required presence of the PKC site of the gamma2L subunit of the GABAa receptor for ethanol potentiation (Wafford et al., 1991). The requirement of the gamma2L insert of the GABAa receptor for ethanol action remains controversial (reviewed by Macdonald, 1995). In any case, the ethanol induced stimulation that I report in the alpha1 glycine receptor is not analogous to the GABAa receptor, since I did not use the alpha1 splice variant that contains a consensus sequence for PKC. However, other sites for protein kinase dependent phosphorylation in the glycine receptor have been described (Ruiz- Gomez et al., 1991), and these should be investigated for their potential role in the modulation of glycine receptor function by ethanol. My results with the 5-HT3 receptor suggest separate sites for ethanol and halothane, since halothane potentiates receptor function in the presence of a saturating concentration of ethanol (Machu and Harris, 1994). Similar studies were not done with the glycine receptor subtypes since saturating concentrations of either ethanol or halothane were not obtained. Thus, it remains unknown whether alcohols and anesthetics share a common site of action in glycine receptors.
In summary, I have demonstrated that cloned glycine receptors are targets for alcohol and anesthetic modulation. My work extends previous studies done in native nervous tissue preparations by showing that not only is an alpha subunit sufficient for modulation by these drugs, but also that there is no difference between the two alpha subunit subtypes tested. Glycine receptor subunits, like the 5-HT3 receptor, form homomeric receptors, which make them ideal candidates for testing amino acid requirements that confer sensitivity to alcohols or anesthetics.
Supported by funds from NIH grant AA10561.
Aguayo, L.G. and Pancetti, F.C. (1994) Ethanol modulation of the gamma-aminobutyric acidA- and glycine-activated Cl- current in cultured mouse neurons. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 270: 61-69.
Akaike, N. and Kaneda, M. (1989) Glycine-gated currents in acutely isolated rat hypothalamic neurons . J. Neurophysiol. 62, 1400-1409.
Antognini, J.F., and Schwartz, K. (1993) Exaggerated anesthetic requirements in the preferentially anesthetized brain. Anesthesiol. 79, 1244-1249.
Betz, H. (1991) Glycine receptors: heterogeneous and widespread distribution in the mammalian brain. Trends Neurosci. 14, 458-461.
Bormann, J., Rundstrom, N., Betz, H., and Langosch, D. (1993) Residues within transmembrane segment M2 determine chloride conductance of glycine receptor homo- and hetero-oligomers. EMBO J. 12, 3729-3737.
Buck, K.J., Allan, A.M., and Harris, R.A. (1989) Fluidization of brain membranes by A2C does not produce anesthesia and does not augment muscimol-stimulated 36Cl- influx. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 160, 359-367.
Cascio, M., Schoppa, N.E., Grodzicki, R.L., Sigworth, F.J., and Fox, R.O. (1993) Functional expression of a homomeric human alpha1 glycine receptor in baculovirus-infected insect cells. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22135-22142.
Celentano, J.J., Gibbs, T.T., and Farb, D.H. (1988) Ethanol potentiates GABA- and glycine- induced currents in chick spinal cord neurons. Brain Res. 455, 377-380.
Colman, A. (1984) Expression of exogenous DNA in Xenopus oocytes. In Transcription and Translation: A Practical Approach., E.B. Hanes and S.J. Higgins, eds., Oxford Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 49-69.
Dildy-Mayfield, J.E. and Harris, R.A. (1992) Comparison of ethanol sensitivity of rat brain kainate, DLa-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxaloneproprionicacid and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 262, 487-494.
Dildy-Mayfield, J.E. and Harris, R.A. (1995) Ethanol inhibits kainate responses of glutamate receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes: role of calcium and protein kinase C. J. Neurosci. 15, 3162-3171.
Engblom, A.C. and Akerman, K.E.O. (1991) Effect of ethanol on gamma amino butyric acidA and glycine receptor- coupled Cl- fluxes in rat brain synaptoneurosomes. J. Neurochem. 57, 384-390.
Franks, N.P. and Lieb, W.R. (1984) Do general anaesthetics act by competitive binding to specific receptors? Nature 300, 487-493.
Franks, N.P. and Lieb, W.R. (1993) Selective actions of volatile general anesthetics as molecular and cellular levels. Br. J. Anaesth. 71, 65-76.
Franks, N.P. and Lieb, W.R. (1994) Molecular and cellular mechanisms of general anesthesia. Nature 367, 607-614.
Grenningloh, G., Schmieden, V., Schofield, P.R., Seeburg, P., Siddique, T., Mohanda, T., Becker, C.-M., and Betz, H. (1990a) Apha subunit variants of the human glycine receptor: primary structures, functional expression and chromosomal localization of the corresponding genes. EMBO J. 9, 771-776.
Grenningloh, G., Pribilla, I., Prior, P., Multhaup, G., Beyreuther, K., Taleb, O., and Betz, H. (1990b) Cloning and expression of the 58 kD beta subunit of the inhibitory glycine receptor. Neuron 4, 963-970.
Hales, T.G., and Lambert, J.J. (1991) The actions of propofol on inhibitory amino acid receptors of bovine adrenal medullary chromaffin cells and rodent central neurons. Br. J. Pharmacol. 104, 619-628.
Harris, R.A., Mihic, S.J., Dildy-Mayfield, J.E., and Machu, T.K. (1995) Actions of anesthetics on ligand-gated ion channels: role of receptor subunit composition. FASEB J. 9, 1454-1462.
Harrison, N.L., Kugler, J.L., Jones, M.V., Greenblatt, E.P., and Pritchett, D.B. (1993) Positive modulation of human gamma-aminobutyric acid type A and glycine receptors by the inhalation anesthetic isoflurane. Mol. Pharmacol. 44, 628-632.
Hill-Venning, C., Peters, J.A., and Lambert, J.J. (1993) The interaction of steroids with inhibitory and excitatory amino acid receptors. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 15 (Suppl. 1), 683A- 684A.
Jones, M.V., Harrison, N.L., Pritchett, D.B., and Hales, T.G. (1995) Modulation of the GABAa receptor by propofol is independent of the gamma subunit. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 274, 962-968.
Kirsch, J. and Betz, H. (1995) The postsynatpic localization of the glycine receptor-associated protein gephyrin is regulated by the cytoskeleton. J. Neurosci. 15, 4148-4156.
Langosch, D., Becker, C.-M., and Betz, H. (1990) The inhibitory glycine receptor: a ligand- gated ion chloride ion channel of the central nervous system. Eur. J. Biochem. 194, 1-8.
Lin, L.-H., Chen, L.L., Zirrolli, J.A., and Harris, R.A. (1992) General anesthetics potentiate gamma amino butyric acid actions on GABAa receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes: lack of involvement of intracellular calcium. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 263, 569-578.
MacDonald, J.F., Miljkovic, Z., and Pennefeather, P. (1987) Use-dependent block of excitatory amino acid currents in cultured neurons by ketamine. J. Neurophysiol. 158, 251-261.
MacDonald, J.F., Mody, I., and Salter, M.W. (1989) Regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors revealed by intracellular dialysis of murine neurons in culture. J. Physiol. 414, 17-34.
Macdonald, R.L. (1995) Ethanol, GABA type A receptors, and protein kinase C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92, 3633-3635.
Machu, T.K. and Harris, R.A. (1994) Alcohols and anesthetics enhance the function of 5- Hydroxytryptamine3 receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 271, 898-905.
Mascia, M.P., Machu, T.K., and Harris, R.A. Enhancement of glycine receptor function by long chain alcohols and anaesthetics. Br. J. Pharmacol., submitted.
Meyer, H. (1901) Zur theorie der alkolnarkose: Der einfluss wechselnder temperatur sur wirkungsstarke und theilungscoefficient dar narcotica. Naunyn Schiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 46, 388-346.
Mihic, S.J., Whiting, P.J., and Harris, R.A. (1994) Anaesthetic concentrations of alcohols potentiate GABAa receptor mediated currents: lack of subunit specificity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 268, 209-214.
Mori-Okamoto, J. and Tatsuno, J. (1985) Development of sensitivity to GABA and glycine in cultured cerebellar neurons. Dev. Brain Res. 20, 249-258.
Overton, E. (1896) Ueber die osmotischen eigenschaften der zelle in ihrer bedeutung fur die toxikologie und pharmakologie. Z. Phys. Chem. 22, 189-209.
Pribilla, I., Takagi, T., Langosch, D., Bormann, J., and Betz, H. (1992) The atypical M2 segement of the beta subunit confers picrotoxin resistance to inhibitory glycine receptor channels. EMBO J. 11, 4305-4311.
Rampil, I.J., Mason, P., and Singh, H. (1993) Anesthetic potency (MAC) is independent of forebrain structures in the rat. Anesthesiol. 78, 707-712.
Ruiz-Gomez, A., Vaello, M.L., Valdivieso, F., and Mayor, F., Jr. (1991) Phosphorylation of the 48-kDa subunit of the glycine receptor by protein kinase C. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 559-566.
Sanna, E. and Harris, R.A. (1993) Neuronal ion channels. In: Recent Developments in Alcoholism. Volume 11: Ten Years of Progress, Marc Galanter, ed., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 169-186.
Taleb, O. and Betz, H. (1994) Expression of the human glycine alpha1 subunit in Xenopus oocytes: apparent affinities of agonists increase at high receptor density. EMBO J. 13, 1318- 1324, 1994.
Wafford, K.A., Burnett,D., Leidenheimer, N.J., Burt, D.R., Wang, J.B., Kofuji, P. Dunwiddie, T.V., Harris, R.A., and Sikela, J.M. (1991) Ethanol sensitivity of the GABAa receptor requires eight amino acids contained in the gamma2L subunit of the receptor complex. Neuron 7, 27-33.
Wafford, K.A., Dunwiddie, T.V., and Harris, R.A. (1989) Calcium-dependent Cl- currents elicited by injection of ethanol. Brain Res. 505, 212-219.
Wakamori, M., Ikemoto, Y., and Akaike, N. (1991) Effects of two volatile anesthetics on the excitatory and inhibitory amino acid responses in dissociated CNS neurons of the rat. J. Neurophysiol. 66, 2014-2021.
Williams, K.L., Ferko, A.P., Barbieri, E.J., and DiGregorio, G.J. (1995) Glycine enhances the central depressant properties of ethanol in mice. Pharmacol., Biochem., and Behav. 50, 199-205.
|
|
|